| Statistics | We have 915 registered users The newest registered user is Earth AD 2754
Our users have posted a total of 23914 messages in 1129 subjects
|
| Updated Research Web | Wed May 08, 2013 5:20 pm by NickTheNick | Okay guys, here is my first Devblog to fulfill my responsibility as Strategy Team lead.
Finally I have procured some work to show for my efforts in conceptualizing the Strategy Mode. The Research Web is a pivotal component of post-sapience gameplay, as it is what drives your species forwards from the Awakening stage to their final steps into Ascension. Through a graphing program, I have managed …
[ Full reading ] | | Comments: 9 |
|
Behaviour Editor Brainstorming
5
5
2
| | Behaviour Editor Brainstorming | |
| |
| Author | Message |
|---|
Guest Guest
 | Subject: Re: Behaviour Editor Brainstorming Sun Jul 15, 2012 10:32 am | |
| Okay, I got it, just one more thing, if two behaviours are conflicting, is one randomly chosen? How will that work? |
|  | | The Uteen Sandbox Team Lead

Posts: 1489 Reputation: 68 Join date: 2010-07-06 Age: 16 Location: England, Virgo Supercluster
 | Subject: Re: Behaviour Editor Brainstorming Sun Jul 15, 2012 3:03 pm | |
| | Gryphogrox wrote: | | Okay, I got it, just one more thing, if two behaviours are conflicting, is one randomly chosen? How will that work? |
... ...
I assume you mean a situation along the lines of a follow and flee action triggered simultaneously? Hm... I hadn't though of that, good point...
Buffering, please wait...
I'd suggest that we have a list of certain actions which conflict, and the player can reorder them to change the priority. Whichever action is higher on that list would take priority over the conflicting behaviour if a conflict was to arise. |
|  | | MeowMan1 Regular

Posts: 255 Reputation: 3 Join date: 2012-03-04 Age: 14 Location: Virginia
 | Subject: Re: Behaviour Editor Brainstorming Mon Jul 16, 2012 7:22 am | |
| I am back from 11 days in tampa, florida. Good idea Uteen. I shall read the rest of this topic, or atleast most of it. |
|  | | Tenebrarum Society Team Lead

Posts: 1179 Reputation: 29 Join date: 2010-10-01 Age: 19 Location: ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
 | Subject: Re: Behaviour Editor Brainstorming Sun Jul 22, 2012 8:17 pm | |
| I did not mention this Uteen, but I ADORE your flowchart idea. It's simple, easily understood and programmed, and allows us to use the parts-palette style of editor that we're using for most everything else.
In addition, it looks to help facilitate the idea of unlocking behaviors as a reward for increasing intelligence, which is something I've been concerned about. |
|  | | ~sciocont Overall Team Lead

Posts: 3277 Reputation: 102 Join date: 2010-07-06
 | Subject: Re: Behaviour Editor Brainstorming Mon Jul 23, 2012 11:52 am | |
| | Tenebrarum wrote: | I did not mention this Uteen, but I ADORE your flowchart idea. It's simple, easily understood and programmed, and allows us to use the parts-palette style of editor that we're using for most everything else.
In addition, it looks to help facilitate the idea of unlocking behaviors as a reward for increasing intelligence, which is something I've been concerned about. |
Agreed. BE should have its own complexity gauge which is measured by brain size. In addition to this, the number and acuity of sense organs should also be limited by the brain of your organism._________________ Remember our goals: simplicity, science, and playability. Keep them in mind always. [OE]| [FAQ]|[Wiki]|[My Blog]  |
|  | | Deathbite42 Regular
Posts: 218 Reputation: -2 Join date: 2012-07-27
 | Subject: Re: Behaviour Editor Brainstorming Sat Jul 28, 2012 1:16 pm | |
| Hold. One guy here said herbivores would be less aggressive than carnivores. That may be stereotype, but it's not true. Hippoes actively chase and kill crocodiles. Think about that for a moment. And the original slider concept would be both easier to program and more visually appealing. |
|  | | ~sciocont Overall Team Lead

Posts: 3277 Reputation: 102 Join date: 2010-07-06
 | Subject: Re: Behaviour Editor Brainstorming Sat Jul 28, 2012 2:51 pm | |
| | Deathbite42 wrote: | | Hold. One guy here said herbivores would be less aggressive than carnivores. That may be stereotype, but it's not true. Hippoes actively chase and kill crocodiles. Think about that for a moment. And the original slider concept would be both easier to program and more visually appealing. |
That's true. Let's stop here, for a moment, and consider what sliders we need to encompass all simple behavior, and what they mean.
Caution/Aggression This would effect the base response to other animals, whether it hides from new things or charges at them. For fine tuning, you could choose its caution/aggression towards each other species (and its own) individually.
Sociality Effects the tendency of multiple members o a species to build communal groups. It doesn't actually effect the behavior of individual animals, just the probability of you encountering more than one at a time.
Territoriality Does the animal claim territory? How big is the territory? How aggressively does it protect that territory?
Intelligence (?) This would probably not be a slider, but by increasing brain size or upgrading neural efficiency, you can put points in an intelligence bar. The number of points here effects how many custom behaviors your organism can have apart from the ones predefined by the sliders.
Curiosity Effects the tendency of the animal to be found outside of its usual habitat or territory from 0% (never leaves) to 50% (spends half of its time away from its usual environment. Will be useful for ETOs.
_________________ Remember our goals: simplicity, science, and playability. Keep them in mind always. [OE]| [FAQ]|[Wiki]|[My Blog]  |
|  | | Deathbite42 Regular
Posts: 218 Reputation: -2 Join date: 2012-07-27
 | Subject: Re: Behaviour Editor Brainstorming Sat Jul 28, 2012 4:25 pm | |
| | ~sciocont wrote: | | Deathbite42 wrote: | | Hold. One guy here said herbivores would be less aggressive than carnivores. That may be stereotype, but it's not true. Hippoes actively chase and kill crocodiles. Think about that for a moment. And the original slider concept would be both easier to program and more visually appealing. |
That's true. Let's stop here, for a moment, and consider what sliders we need to encompass all simple behavior, and what they mean.
Caution/Aggression This would effect the base response to other animals, whether it hides from new things or charges at them. For fine tuning, you could choose its caution/aggression towards each other species (and its own) individually.
Sociality Effects the tendency of multiple members o a species to build communal groups. It doesn't actually effect the behavior of individual animals, just the probability of you encountering more than one at a time.
Territoriality Does the animal claim territory? How big is the territory? How aggressively does it protect that territory?
Intelligence (?) This would probably not be a slider, but by increasing brain size or upgrading neural efficiency, you can put points in an intelligence bar. The number of points here effects how many custom behaviors your organism can have apart from the ones predefined by the sliders.
Curiosity Effects the tendency of the animal to be found outside of its usual habitat or territory from 0% (never leaves) to 50% (spends half of its time away from its usual environment. Will be useful for ETOs.
|
But what if ETOs spend more than 50% of the time away from the territory it inhabits the most? Example: 40% of time in in grassland, 30% in jungle, 30% in desert? |
|  | | ~sciocont Overall Team Lead

Posts: 3277 Reputation: 102 Join date: 2010-07-06
 | Subject: Re: Behaviour Editor Brainstorming Sat Jul 28, 2012 4:41 pm | |
| I'm thinking of running ETOs as a separate category. They live in and are tethered to evolution in one biome (I guess it would be a sort of breeding ground), but spread out into surrounding biomes. Their populations in nonnative biomes are proportional to those in the native biome. _________________ Remember our goals: simplicity, science, and playability. Keep them in mind always. [OE]| [FAQ]|[Wiki]|[My Blog]  |
|  | | Deathbite42 Regular
Posts: 218 Reputation: -2 Join date: 2012-07-27
 | Subject: Re: Behaviour Editor Brainstorming Sat Jul 28, 2012 4:50 pm | |
| Perhaps a better idea is simply having a list of all available biomes. You are given a percent of time in each of them, from 0 to 100, but the total is always 100. |
|  | | ~sciocont Overall Team Lead

Posts: 3277 Reputation: 102 Join date: 2010-07-06
 | Subject: Re: Behaviour Editor Brainstorming Sat Jul 28, 2012 5:11 pm | |
| | Deathbite42 wrote: | | Perhaps a better idea is simply having a list of all available biomes. You are given a percent of time in each of them, from 0 to 100, but the total is always 100. |
I' not quite sure I understand what you're trying to say._________________ Remember our goals: simplicity, science, and playability. Keep them in mind always. [OE]| [FAQ]|[Wiki]|[My Blog]  |
|  | | Deathbite42 Regular
Posts: 218 Reputation: -2 Join date: 2012-07-27
 | Subject: Re: Behaviour Editor Brainstorming Sat Jul 28, 2012 5:16 pm | |
| Carnodon 100% of time in desert 0% of time in jungle 0% of time in plains Cannot survive in taiga! Cannot survive in tundra! Cannot survive in deep sea! Cannot survive in coral reef! |
|  | | ~sciocont Overall Team Lead

Posts: 3277 Reputation: 102 Join date: 2010-07-06
 | Subject: Re: Behaviour Editor Brainstorming Sat Jul 28, 2012 5:22 pm | |
| | Deathbite42 wrote: | Carnodon 100% of time in desert 0% of time in jungle 0% of time in plains Cannot survive in taiga! Cannot survive in tundra! Cannot survive in deep sea! Cannot survive in coral reef! |
Ok, makes sense. the problem with ETOs isn't where they spend their time, its whose evolution they effect. See, since each biome is a self-contained stage for evolution, if you spend half of your time in one, and half in another, where do you evolve in? Where does your population really reside?
_________________ Remember our goals: simplicity, science, and playability. Keep them in mind always. [OE]| [FAQ]|[Wiki]|[My Blog]  |
|  | | Deathbite42 Regular
Posts: 218 Reputation: -2 Join date: 2012-07-27
 | Subject: Re: Behaviour Editor Brainstorming Sat Jul 28, 2012 5:32 pm | |
| You evolve in both. Your population really resides in both. They affect the evolution of both. Let me explain. Imagine you are a species whose lifespan lasts bilions of years. you also have a massive lab. In one, you put a self-contained jungle. It has many creatures, from monkeys to snakes. The other is a sea with even more. That makes for a LOT of wildlife. But one species is special. His name is The Saltwater Crocodile, and he can live in both. You give him a bridge they can use to freely move from vat to vat. You will see that there evolve both monkeys that crawl into trees to evade him, and fish with scales he cannot break. However, let's say there is a leopard with more bite power than him. It lives in the jungle. The prior mentioned fish will only withstand the crocodile's bite power, because it will never meeet a jaguar. |
|  | | ~sciocont Overall Team Lead

Posts: 3277 Reputation: 102 Join date: 2010-07-06
 | Subject: Re: Behaviour Editor Brainstorming Mon Jul 30, 2012 10:47 am | |
| | Deathbite42 wrote: | | You evolve in both. Your population really resides in both. They affect the evolution of both. Let me explain. Imagine you are a species whose lifespan lasts bilions of years. you also have a massive lab. In one, you put a self-contained jungle. It has many creatures, from monkeys to snakes. The other is a sea with even more. That makes for a LOT of wildlife. But one species is special. His name is The Saltwater Crocodile, and he can live in both. You give him a bridge they can use to freely move from vat to vat. You will see that there evolve both monkeys that crawl into trees to evade him, and fish with scales he cannot break. However, let's say there is a leopard with more bite power than him. It lives in the jungle. The prior mentioned fish will only withstand the crocodile's bite power, because it will never meeet a jaguar. |
The problem is that with our system, it gives ETOs an unfair advantage, because they have a chance to evolve in every biome that they pass through, making their mutation probability much higher. However, I think I've been overlooking an obvious solution, which is to divide their modified odds in step 3 by the number of biomes they inhabit._________________ Remember our goals: simplicity, science, and playability. Keep them in mind always. [OE]| [FAQ]|[Wiki]|[My Blog]  |
|  | | | | Behaviour Editor Brainstorming | |
|
Similar topics |  |
|
| | Permissions in this forum: | You cannot reply to topics in this forum
| |
| |
| |